Course Topics & Titles?

One of the main requirements for our class is designing a syllabus for a course we would like to teach (and then teaching/leading some activity from an actually session). At first, this seemed easy enough to me. But I am trying to take to heart Dr. Smith’s encouragement to us to go outside our comfort zones and do some new things. So, I have changed from what I had initially planned to something else. What I am thinking about is some introductory class on the Bible that looks at it in a fresher or more appealing way. Having a great deal of interest also in all kinds of literature, it comes to me that something along the lines of the Bible as literature (a common course taught in community colleges these days) might be a possibility. The aim is to help persons make sense of the Bible by approaching it as literature. I’m not certain that many people realize the impact of the Bible, especially on western civilization and especially in literature. I also have a feeling that the Bible may well be seen as a mysterious, out-dated book that’s only read in Sunday school, which has no relevance to our world at all. So what I would like to do is offer something that would help persons overcome some of this, gain real ability to read and understand the Bible, and make connections on how it has and still is impacting society. It seems approaching it from a literary standpoint might be a good way to begin doing some of that. I know what I want to do with the course, but a title for it escapes me presently. I don’t know – are titles for course important? If so, how important? If you were a student at GMU or a community college, would a course like the one above have any interest at all? What might a more engaging, interesting title or even topic be? I’d appreciate your feedback and thoughts. Maybe I need to scrap that whole idea and come up with another. Thanks, Bass

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

2/22/11 – Class Notes

Class discussion on university goals and formlating a mission statement. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Michael Wesch: From Knowledgeable to Knowledge-Able

Thanks to Jonathan for sending on this video:

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Interesting article in Post about creative use of technology in teaching

Friends, I came across this piece and thought it was interesting in light of our last class session on various uses of the technology for teaching/connecting with students and even a larger audience. It also interested me because I am a real Tolkien fan myself.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/02/09/AR2011020903117.html

Bass

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Journal Selection for 2/22/2011

Bridging the Divide — Seeing Mathematics in the World Through Dynamic Geometry
Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications
Volume 30 Issue 1

Abstract:
In TMA, Oldknow (2009, TEAMAT, 28, 180–195) called for ways to unlock students’ skills so that they increase learning about the world of mathematics and the objects in the world around them. This article examines one way in which we may unlock the student skills. We are currently exploring the potential for students to ‘see’ mathematics in the real world through ‘marking’ mathematical features of digital images using a dynamic geometry system (GeoGebra). In this article we present, as a partial response to Oldknow, preliminary results.
Continue reading

Posted in Knowledge Building | Leave a comment

Journal Choice

The journal I have selected to follow for the rest of the course is Teaching Mathematics and its Applications published by Oxford University Press. Continue reading

Posted in Knowledge Building | Leave a comment

Journal – Driscoll & Wood Chapters 1-3

The first three chapters of Outcomes-based Assessment did well to provide me with a broad view of the environment needed to implement this different approach to  “grading” students.  The first and most important aspect of the text was the necessity for outcomes-bases assessments to be a collaborative effort.  The collaboration has multiple tiers or threads between differing bodies of contributors.  Of these threads, the need for institutional collaboration was the most aspect that I learned the most about.  Having institutional support to structure your class around OBA was something that I was privy to, but the collaboration aspect was new to me.

Having Faculty Learning Communities will provide a variety of perspectives from differing disciplines.  Since I was used to standard content based assessments the benefit  of outside  knowledge did not seem particularly useful to me due to their lack of expertise.  But outcomes-based assessments are much more transient and universal instead of pockets of expert knowledge.  In many ways our classroom is a FLC but in a classroom setting.  I plan to leverage the experiences and opinions of our class to discuss how to transition into outcomes-based assessments.  In future practice I will consult with instructors not only within my own discipline but across the entire university.

In a procedural fashion, after the initiative to foster FLCs and deep discussion into outcomes-based assessment is decided, establishing the ensuing attitudes into the culture of the university is the next integral step to developing outcomes-based assessments.  Empowerment, Iterative Learning, and Safety are the necessary cultural qualities in addition to the aforementioned collaboration/communication.  By giving teachers ownership of their own class’s construction and growth, they gain a sense of empowerment which directly affects motivation.  The correlation between empowerment and motivation is not education specific, yet it seems to be forgotten in the context of teachers and education.  This is vital in the transition from teaching being a “duty” and becoming a passion.

The concept of iterative learning was best described in the text as a learning paradigm in contrast to the standard teaching paradigm.  The teacher’s focus should not be in “teaching” which tends to connote a more one-way transference of knowledge.  In a learning paradigm the teacher can take on the role of a learner as well and the classroom becomes a cyclic progression of the teacher proposing subject matter and the class (teacher included) flesh out the topic to draw their own conclusions with guidance from the teacher.  I’ve recently experimented with this style in my Applied IT Programming class that I teach.  Instead of “lecturing” with a singular in-class exercise that attempts to capture the concepts in the class, I have implemented more of a learning paradigm where students take turns writing code and the rest critique and praise.  Not only is the learning much more active, by having the students write the code their common mistakes surface (something that would not happen with an expert practitioner writing the code) and they can be immediately addressed.

This activity leads into the third tenant of safety which is an intentional byproduct of the learning style.  I prefaced the exercise telling the students they WILL make mistakes; however, mistakes are part of learning.  Each student brings  their own perspective on the code and with different people working on a collective document we get to see the differing styles.  This is continually praised in the class and throughout the duration of the class I saw a steadily forming sense of safety where students shed their inhibitions and began volunteering more confidently knowing they were entering a process, and not just an single activity.  After-all, mistakes are where learning is done, so without mistakes how can true learning happen?

These chapters helped frame the context in which I wanted to structure my new classes and I am confident the following chapters will help evolve this style much in the iterative process that is advocated.

Posted in Knowledge Building | Leave a comment

Journal entry 1 – Kuhta

Ellen Mrjra’s review of Media Studies: An Introduction is a helpful tool when deciding curriculum for a new media class.  Media is evolving at a rapid pace and it is important for textbooks and scholars to keep up with this pace in order for the next generation of journalists to stay relevant and informed.

With the introduction of the World Wide Web in the early 1990’s, media changed forever.  “Traditional delineations among producer, channel, and audience have been blended, merged, destroyed. Web 2.0 demands a Media Studies 2.0 response.” Mrjra’s analysis and review of the text book Media Studies: An Introduction explores the issue of “textbooks having only a ‘vague recognition of the internet and new digital media.’”

It is important for students to see the evolution of print media into digital media.  This article explains that transition and offers a textbook that she recommends media professors apply in the classroom.  The author of the textbook, Robert Kolker, is professor emeritus at UMd and is a “leading twentieth-century mass media scholar.”

Instead of chapters focusing on the traditional thoughts of media, for example, “journalist-as-sleuth,” Kolker uses unique current events to explain how media has changed. He cites Anderson Cooper’s coverage of Hurricane Katrina and NBC’s To Catch A Predator. Mrjra writes, “by studying these and other patterns of kind, Kolker gives students the ability to analyze the culture of the media.”

Kolker breaks his textbook down into “threads.”  These threads, or key points, are intertwined throughout the textbook, very similar to the way the Internet functions.

Interestingly, in an attempt to stay current, and realizing that a textbook itself is static in the digital age each chapter ends with URLs that students may go to in order to learn more about a certain topic.

As new media evolves it is critical for new media education to keep pace.  Textbooks and reviews like this ensure that our institutions are providing the highest level of media education.

http://proquest.umi.com.mutex.gmu.edu/pqdweb?index=2&did=2041368061&SrchMode=1&sid=3&Fmt=3&VInst=PROD&VType=PQD&RQT=309&VName=PQD&TS=1298043518&clientId=31810

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Teachng Journal – Kuhta

I have chosen to read articles from the Journalism & Mass Communication Educator. My plan is to teach Journalism and Communication on the freshman and sophomore level.  This journal offers many different articles from scholars in the field.

It is important to stay current on the different issues that face the Journalism field.  This journal tackles those issues and helps instructors inform their students of what is happening in the journalism world, both in class and on the job.  For example, an article entitled, Rigor or Remediation? Exploring Writing Proficiency and Assessment Measures in Journalism and Mass Communication Programs explores how proficient students are when entering the program and whether teachers should use a rigorous approach to enhance proficiency or if the teacher should use a remedial approach in order to help the students develop.  The article also touches on the notion of whether teachers need to meet the students at their needs as opposed to teaching a lesson and assuming the student is prepared to follow that particular lesson.

I believe this article will help to prepare me for assessing students abilities and deciding the best way to teach them.  This pertains to Bain’s readings as well, all students learn at different levels and different ways and it is important for me, as a teacher, to understand each student’s proficiency and determine what the best method of teaching will be.

Another interesting article within the journal is 2009 Assessment of the Status of Diversity Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Programs. This article states:

Using survey responses from 105 academic programs, findings support earlier studies that found the number of special courses on media diversity is increasing steadily. Findings also identify a preference for integrating diversity content across the curriculum. Among factors pushing these improvements are accreditation standards and an increasing multicultural environment.

This covers many different aspects of what I am currently working on.  My field will be Community College specific, so this article not only touches on improving the diversity of the types of classes offered but also on creating a more multicultural atmosphere.  This is a major discussion at the Community College level.  I can benefit from learning how to integrate the classrooms and effectively teach all the students.

Lastly, a passage by John D. Shelley is intriguing.  The passage discusses being a correspondent in World War II where he covered the Battle of the Bulge.  This passage and many like it are important for Journalism students to read.  First hand accounts of embedded journalists show the different and unique challenges of covering stories in a war zone.  This is an extremely valid topic considering today’s strife around the world.

Reading a journal that covers topics ranging from how to teach journalism students to real life reporting and the challenges that come with the job will help me stay abreast of the most current issues within journalism.  I look forward to learning about the growing practices of teaching journalism and the evolution from print to digital, also, the passages and stories of those who have worked as teachers, reporters and editors for many years and are now in a place to pass on their expertise.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

BMelton Post for 21 Feb

The article I chose for this week is titled “Training Teachers to Teach Probability” and can be found at http://www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v12n1/batanero.html .  I chose this article as I have been thinking about how I might approach teaching probability to future students.  The article provided a way to teach probability as an introductory lesson and gave an understanding about how an instructor may miss the level of difficulty inherent in the material. 

The article makes the point that math teachers at the elementary and secondary school level have a difficult time understanding probability when the concepts are counterintuitive to the way most people think.  They conducted two different experiments where the teachers were asked to make some judgment calls based upon their knowledge and intuition.  One was looking at two sequences of head-tail results; one real, the other made up, than decide which was which.  The other was looking at one side of a two sided counter and, given certain assumptions, guessing the color of the other side.  Strategies on how they decided were discussed and then participants tried again using a different strategy.  If the participant got better results, their conclusions were reinforced, despite the fact that statistically there was no correlation.

The argument here was that there are rules to probability that are not going to change.  But what was really eye opening to me was how even teachers with background in math and science would struggle with the counterintuitive arguments associated with probability. 

From this I learned that I must be mindful about how difficult it might be for an introductory statistics course and not assume my students should grasp it easily.  From the wider view of how to teach this field, it is easy to slip into the idea that just explaining concepts should be fairly clear.  But through the use of problem or case studies such as shown in the article, the concepts can be taught with greater impact to the students.

Posted in Knowledge Building | 2 Comments