Old Syllabi

A question for Dr. Smith and the class:

I taught several classes almost 20 years ago (Introduction to the Old Testament, etc). I recently came across the syllabi. Should I include them in the portfolio as is? Or should I revise them? I mean, if I were teaching these today, having been through this class, I certainly would make changes. Maybe a BEFORE and AFTER kind-of thing? Would that be something portfolio worthy? Your ideas, thoughts?

Bass

About bassman

Seeking doctor of arts with concentration in adult education and religious studies. Am a United Methodist minister. Writer. Father of two and husband of one (not in that order). Love to read. Love Scifi anything. Love Tolkien.
This entry was posted in Philosophies & Portfolios. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Old Syllabi

  1. bassman says:

    One consideration is that I am not certain if such classes are even in demand today. I know from talking with some of the religion professors at GMU that they once offered them but do not any longer. Exploring why this is the case would be interesting. So to spend a lot of time revising them might not be a wise use of time. Might be better to develop some new course ideas and syllabi. Just giving you some more of what I am thinking. Would welcome your thoughts.
    Bass

  2. Ginny says:

    Bass, I think that your previous work is valid despite the age of the material. You could write a short intro to your newest syllabus stating how much you’ve learned and the changes you have made in your writing.

    I have found some good syllabi for early childhood education classes online. I have found a few that are excellent, and I have found some that are truly terrible! The sad thing is that the terrible syllabi are NOT old, but are currently being used!!

  3. Lesley Smith says:

    I think it’s always worth spending time with old syllabi, as one can often look at ideas and assignments, and think – wait, why am I not doing that now? So they might be a source for inspiration. Also, they might provide evidence of a strong, foundational ethos in teaching and learning which might still animate your work, and could be integrated in that way. Also, as Ginny suggests, they might allow you to offer evidence of key changes in approach over the years or, as you suggest, a way to demonstrate your awareness of how your field and discipline has changed, and how aware you are of new needs and perspectives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *